COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN CONSERVATIVE AND OPERATIVE TREATMENT OF FIFTH METATARSAL BASE FRACTURE IN YOUNG ADULTS AND ATHLETES
2020, July, Volume 10-Number 3 October 6, 2020Author name : | Dr. Ranjit Kumar Dutta1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Page no : | 91-95 | Volume : | 10 | Issue : | 3 |
doi no.: 05-2016-44975451, DOI Link :: http://doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2020-13992563/
Dr. Ranjit Kumar Dutta1
Affiliation :
- B.B.S., M.S (Ortho), Dip. In Sports Med. (JU), Associate professor, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Jagannath Gupta Institute of Medical science & Hospital, 137, K.P. Mondal Road, Buita, Budge Budge, Kolkata – 700137, duttaranjitkumar1952@gmail.com
ABSTRACT
Fifth metatarsal base fracture is a common foot injury in young adults and athletes. This study was done to compare between conservative and surgical treatment in displaced avulsion fracture of fifth metatarsal base in young adults and athletes. Forty-eight patients with displaced fifth metatarsal base avulsion fracture were selected by randomization. Four (8.33%) patients were lost to follow up. Conservative group were immobilized with below knee P.O.P. cast, while operative group were treated by closed reduction and fixation with percutaneous screw or tension band wiring. All patients were followed up at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months. All cases had primary union except for 4 (Four) patients from conservative group and 1 (one) patient from operative group. In conservative group 2 patients results in mal union and 2 with frequent mild to moderate plantar pain. There was non-union of one patient from operative group. The result was better in operative group at 6 months after treatment, but there was no significant difference at 3 months and 12 months. The average time of full weight bearing and returning to work was significantly shortened in operative group than conservative group.
Keywords: Avulsion fractures, closed reduction, conservative treatment, fifth metatarsal base fixation
DOWNLOAD FULL TEXT:
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Jones, R.1.(1902), Fracture of the base of the fifth Metatarsal bone by indirect violence. Ann Surg. 35: 697-700
Quil G E. (1995), Fractures of the proximal fifth Metatarsal, Orthop Clin North AM , 26: 353-361
Gen-Bin Wu , Bing Li and Yun-Feng Yang (2017), Comparative study of surgical and conservative treatment for fifth metatarsal base avulsion fracture (Type-1) in young adults or athletes. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery, 26(1) : 1-5.
Akiman, P.I., Cowthron, K.L., Dakin, W.M, et.al. (2016), Symptomatic treatment or cast immobilisation for avulsion fractures of the base of fifth metatarsal. A prospective, randomised, single -blinded controlled trial. Bone joint, 98-b: 806-811
Husain ZS & De Fronzo DJ (2000), Relative stability of tension band versus two-cortex screw fixation for treating fifth metatarsal base avulsion fractures. J foot ankle Surg 39: 89-95.
Porter, D.A., Duncan, M . and Meyer, S. J. (2005), Fifth Metatarsal Jone’s Fracture fixation with a 4.5 mm canulated stainless steel screw in the competitive and recreational athletes. A clinical and radiographic evaluation. AM J sports Med. 33: 726-733
Mologne, T.S., Lundeen, J.M., Clapper, M.F. and O’Brien, T.J. (2005), Early screw fixation versus casting in the treatment of Acute Jones Fracture. AM J. Sports Med. 33: 970-975
Sarimo, J., Rantanen, J. and Oravas, A. J.(2006), Tension – Band wiring for fractures of the fifth metatarsal located in the junction of the proximal metaphysis and diaphysis. AM J. Sports Med. 34: 476-480.