THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT JOINTS’ ANGLES ON THE PERFORMANCE OF OROMIA REGIONAL STATE CLUBS LONG JUMPERS: A KINEMATICAL STUDY

2019, October, Volume 9-Number 4
Author name : Samson Wondirad, Amanu Eba and Asim Khan
Page no : 44-50 Volume : 9 Issue : 4

doi no.: 05-2016-44975451, DOI Link :: http://doi-ds.org/doilink/12.2019-21132359/


Samson Wondirad1, Amanu Eba2 and Asim Khan3


Affiliations

  1. Assistant Professor, Department of Sport Science, College of Natural Science, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia
  2. Lecturer, Department of Sport Science, College of Natural Science, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia
  3. Assistant Professor, Department of Sport Science, College of Natural Science, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia

ABSTRACT


Ethiopia is the potential area in order to produce world class long jumpers. However, intensive work has been never done on the area of biomechanics. Thus, this study was designed to assess the Biomechanics analysis of long jumpers’ on Oromia region athletic clubs. For the purpose of this study 20 long jumpers from six clubs (Burayu, Lagatafo, Sululta, Sebeta, Adama and Bishoftu) were selected as the subject. To acquire the kinematical data one high speed Nikon: Coolpix P900 video recording camera mounted at a height of 5 feet was placed 10 meters away perpendicular to the long jump pit.  All subjects were performed three jumps, all the jump performances were recorded and downloaded in the personal computer and only best performance of each subject was selected for further analysis. The digitization of the obtained data was done with the help of Kinovea motion analysis software. The kinematical variables for the study were taken as ankle, knee, shoulder and elbow joints angle. All statistical procedures were conducted using the SPSS 23.0 Version software. A level of significance was set at 0.05. Pearson product moment correlation coefficient was used to find-out the relationship between long jumpers’ seasonal best performance and joint angles in different phases. Multiple regressions coefficient was used to analyze the effect of release parameters angles at release during take-off on jumping distance. The result of this study shows that Knee joint angle has significant relationship with the performance at take-off preparation (r = -0.67, p<0.05) and Take-off phase (r = -0.53, P< 0.05. Knee angle during take-off preparation phase and take off phase explained by 67.6% of variance (R2=.676, F(18, 2.72) =, 15.1, p < 0.05). Effect size of long jump take-off preparation knee angle was significant (R2=.676, F (18, 2.72) =, 15.1, Beta value (B) = -0.016, p < 0.05) and take off phase (R2=.676, F (18, 2.72) =, 15.1,Beta value (B) = -0.014, p < 0.05). on the basis of the findings of this study it is concluded that both phases (take-off preparation and take-off), knee joint angle has low effect size on long jumpers’ seasonal performances.


Key words: Biomechanics, Joints Angles, kinematics and Long Jumpers.


DOWNLOAD FULL TEXT:  url

BIBLIOGRAPHY


Akwinder, K. & Nishan, D. (2016). Kinematical Analysis of Javelin Throw. International Journal of Physiology, Nutrition and Physical Education, 1(1): 86-88.

Bridgett, LA.; Linthorne, N. P. (2006). Changes in long jump take-off technique with increasing run-up speed. Journal of Sports Sciences, 24(8): 889 – 897.

Graham-Smith, P., & Lees, A. (2005).  A three-dimensional kinematic analysis of the long jump take-off. Journal of Sports Sciences, 23(9): 891-903. doi:10.1080/02640410400022169

IAAF.(2015). Athletics rules and regulation. Monaco

Hussain, I., Khan, A., Mohammad,  A., Bari, M.A. and Ahmad, A. (2011). A comperison of selected kinemetical parameters between male and female intervarsity long jumpers. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 11(2): 72 -77.

Knuodson, D. (2007). Qualitative biomechanical principles for application in coaching. Sports Biomechanics, 6(1): 109–118

Lees, A., Fowler, N., & Derby, D. (1993). A biomechanical analysis of the last stride, touch-down and take-off characteristics of the women’s long jump. Journal of Sports Sciences, 11: 303-3 14.

Linthorne N.P., Baker C., Douglas M.M.M., Hill G.A. and Webster R.G. (2011). Take-off forces and impulses in the long jump. In: Applied Biomechanics in Sports, Portuguese Journal of Sport Sciences, 11(Suppl. 2).Eds: Veloso A.P., Alves F., Ferdinandes R.J., Conceição F., Vilas-Boas J.P., editors. 33-36.

Marion, L.  and Alexander, J. (2005). Comparison of biomechanical aspects of performance in male and female athletes. University of Manitoba

Melvin,  R. (2016).  Biomechanics of the long jump and triple jump. Department of Civil Engineering and Department of Physical Education, University of California, Davis, California 95616, U.S.A.

Mikael, G & Daniel, Z. (2015). Determination of biomechanical key parameters in women’s long jump: An analysis of Swedish elite athletes in a competitive setting.

Morinaga, M., Yasui, T., Jyujyo, A., Kato, H., Okano, Y., Koyama,Y.,& Sawamura, H. (2003). The differences of the motions between good jumps and poor jumps from each preparatory motion for takeoff through takeoff in long jump (in Japanese), Research Quarterly for Athletics, 52:12-21.

Nemtsev, O., Pevneva, M.,  ALEKSANDR Polyanskiy, A., Dukalskaya, A. and Doludenko, E. (2018). Qualification differences in interrelationships of takeoff variables of male long jumpers.  Journal of Physical Education and Sport (JPES), 18 Supplement issue 1, Art  69:485 – 489.

Nicholas, L, Maurice, G. and Lisa, B. (2005). Optimum take-off angle in the long jump.Journal of Sport sciences 23(7):703-12

Seyfarth, A.; Blickhan, R.; Van Leeuwen, J.L. (2000). Optimum take-off techniques and   muscle design for longjump. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 203: 741-750

Thomas, J, Luis, M, &  Wolfgang,  S. (2001). Analysis of the Long Jump Technique in the Transition From Approach to Takeoff Based on Time-Continuous Kinematic Data. European Journal of Sport Science, 1(5).

Yutaka, S., Michiyo, A.and Hiroyuki, K. (2011). A biomechanical study of the takeoff preparation and the takeoff motions in elite male long jumpers. Portuguese Journal of Sport Sciences, 11 (Suppl. 2): 381-383.

Related Articles

Back to Top