INVESTIGATION OF LEADERSHIP BEHAVIOUR AS PREFERRED BY INDIAN FEMALE VOLLEYBALL PLAYERS

Volume 7-Number 2, April, 2017
Author name : Dr. Harendra Singh
Page no : 42-47 Volume : 7 Issue : 2

doi no.: 05.2017-58949138  DOI Link :: http://doi-ds.org/doilink/05.2017-58949138/


Dr. Harendra Singh1


Affiliations:

1 Lecturer Vijay Singh Pathrik Govt. PG College, Kairana, Shamli (U.P.)-Pin  Code-247774.

E-mail-harendersingh096@gmail.com


ABSTRACT


The purpose of the study was to assess and investigate the preferred leadership behaviour of Indian female volleyball players. For this purpose,  Two hundred and thirty four (Females= 234)) National  level Volleyball players representing their respective state teams  in Senior National  Volleyball Competition (W) and who volunteered to participate in this study, were selected to serve as subjects for this study Leadership Scale for Sports developed by P. Chelladurai (1994) was selected as a criterion tool to measure preferences  on five dimensions of preferred leadership behaviour of national level male and female volleyball players. To assess the preferred  leader  behaviour of National  level female Volleyball players, means, standard deviations and Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was computed were computed. Wherever, the F-ratio was found significant. The statistical analysis of collected data revealed that the  national  level  female  volleyball players   exhibited  different preferences on five dimensions of leader behaviour. National level  female volleyball players preferred in greater amount of training and instruction followed by positive feedback, social support, democratic behaviour  and  autocratic   behaviour from their coaches.


Keywords: Preferences, National level, Gymnasts, Leadership, Behaviour, Females.


DOWNLOAD FULL TEXT:    url

BIBLIOGRAPHY


Chelladurai. P. (1994) Manual of Leadership Scale for Sports , U.S.A: Ohio State University,

Clarke,  Harrison H. and Clarke,  David H. (1972),  “Advance Statistics : Supplementary Research Processes in Physical Education, Recreation and Heath(Engle wood Cliffs, New Jersey : Prentice Hall INC.,), pp. 20-25.

Clarke Harrison H. and Clarke, David H. (1970)  “Research Processes  in Physical    Education,    Recreation and Health (Englewood    Cliffs, New Jersey Prentice Hall INC.,), pp. 205-207.

Morgan, W.P. ( 1986) Sports Personology. The Credules – Skeptical Argument in Perspective in Sports Psychology. An Analysis of Athletic Behaviour. (Ed. W. Straub Movement Pub. In this N.Y. Cited by Stan power . Psychological Assessment Procedures at a Track & Reid National Event Squad Training Weekend’ Sports science Education by J. Watkins. Thomas Reilly and Les Burtwiz (London : E & FN Spon, 1986): 181.

Rothstein,   Anne   L. (1985)   Research   Design   and   Statistics   for   Physical Education (Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey   Prentice Hall INC,) , pp. 111-113.

Simon E. ‘Scope and Function of Research in Sports and Physical Education’ Flip Bulletin 34 (1964) : 98.

Singer, R.N., Murphy M. and Tennat,  L. Keith (1993) Hand Book of Research on Sport Psychology (New York : McMillan Publishing Co), PP 647 – 648.

Vanek, Miraslav and Cratty.  Bryant J. (1980) Psychology and Superior Athlete (London : Macmillan Co. Ltd.), P. 139.

Williams, Jean M. (1993) Applied sport psychology : Personal Growth to peak performance (California : Mayfield Publishing Company), pp. 82-83.

Related Articles

Back to Top